Conference designs C(18, 10)
This page contains information about conference designs. The results have been generated with the Orthogonal Array package. If you use these results, please cite the paper A Classification Criterion for Definitive Screening Designs, E.D. Schoen, P.T. Eendebak, P. Goos, Annals of Statistics, 2019.
Results
| Statistic | Results |
| Number of non-isomorphic designs | 26 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix with 2FI and QE | 18/18 |
| Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix for 2FI | 17/17 |
| Minimum B4 | 10.2963 |
| Maximum B4 | 11.6790 |
| Minimum F4 | (0, 0, 79, 131) |
| Maximum F4 | (6, 4, 44, 156) |
| Data | all arrays |
Note: 2FI: two-factor interaction; QE: quadratic effect
Pareto optimal designs
There are 7 Pareto optimal designs in 7 classes. Pareto optimality is according to r(2FI, QE), r(2FI), F4, B4, PEC4, PEC5, PIC4, PIC5, PPC4, and PPC5 (any other statistics are ignored).
| Index Pareto file | Index design file | Rank 2FI and QE | Rank 2FI | F4 | B4 | PEC4 | PEC5 | PIC4 | PIC5 | PPC4 | PPC5 | Extensions | Max. columns |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 19 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 79, 131) | 10.40 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.549 | 14.537 | 1.717 | 1.089 | Yes | 18 |
| 4 | 17 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 82, 128) | 10.69 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.541 | 14.512 | 1.718 | 1.091 | Yes | 18 |
| 2 | 10 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 85, 125) | 10.99 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.533 | 14.491 | 1.718 | 1.092 | Yes | 18 |
| 3 | 13 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 85, 125) | 10.99 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.534 | 14.496 | 1.717 | 1.093 | Yes | 18 |
| 6 | 25 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 86, 124) | 11.09 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.529 | 14.478 | 1.720 | 1.095 | Yes | 18 |
| 1 | 9 | 18 | 17 | (0, 0, 88, 122) | 11.28 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 15.527 | 14.493 | 1.717 | 1.101 | Yes | 18 |
| 0 | 6 | 18 | 17 | (0, 4, 66, 140) | 10.30 | 0.981 | 0.746 | 15.275 | 10.977 | 1.693 | 0.846 | No | 10 |
Page generated on Tue Oct 22 20:35:41 2019.