Class C(22, 10)

Conference designs C(22, 10)

This page contains information about conference designs. The results have been generated with the Orthogonal Array package. If you use these results, please cite the paper A Classification Criterion for Definitive Screening Designs, E.D. Schoen, P.T. Eendebak, P. Goos, Annals of Statistics, 2019.

Results

Statistic Results
Number of non-isomorphic designs 16865
Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix with 2FI and QE 21/22
Minimum/Maximum rank of model matrix for 2FI 20/21
Minimum B4 7.6860
Maximum B4 16.1488
Minimum F4 (0, 0, 6, 96, 108)
Maximum F4 (3, 0, 11, 44, 152)

Note: 2FI: two-factor interaction; QE: quadratic effect


Pareto optimal designs

There are 8 Pareto optimal designs in 8 classes. Pareto optimality is according to r(2FI, QE), r(2FI), F4, and B4 (any other statistics are ignored).

All Pareto optimal designs.

Index Pareto file Index design file Rank 2FI and QE Rank 2FI F4 B4 PEC4 PEC5 PIC4 PIC5 PPC4 PPC5 Extensions
6 14893 21 20 (0, 0, 6, 96, 108) 9.27 1.000 1.000 18.530 18.137 1.823 1.328 No
5 14891 22 21 (0, 0, 6, 100, 104) 9.54 1.000 1.000 18.527 18.065 1.820 1.297 No
2 5001 22 21 (0, 0, 7, 80, 123) 8.41 1.000 1.000 18.568 18.212 1.820 1.293 No
1 2998 22 21 (0, 0, 8, 75, 127) 8.28 1.000 0.992 18.573 18.074 1.820 1.277 No
3 5085 22 21 (0, 0, 9, 70, 131) 8.15 1.000 1.000 18.579 18.226 1.820 1.285 No
0 1101 22 21 (0, 0, 15, 51, 144) 8.08 1.000 1.000 18.585 18.263 1.819 1.292 No
4 12857 22 21 (0, 0, 25, 20, 165) 8.02 1.000 1.000 18.581 18.216 1.829 1.294 No
7 15755 21 20 (0, 0, 30, 0, 180) 7.69 1.000 1.000 18.579 18.227 1.842 1.326 No


Page generated on Tue Oct 22 20:35:41 2019.